Moving forward
Blog

MVP vs. MLP - Choosing the Right Approach

Compare MVP and MLP to choose the best approach for your startup’s goals, resources, and product stage.
#
MVP
#
Software Development
Frontentica
February 12, 2025
Table of content

MVP vs. MLP - Choosing the Right Approach for Your Product Development

When it comes to creating a new product, startups and companies face an important decision: should they create a Minimum Viable Product (MVP) or a Minimum Lovable Product (MLP)? Both approaches have their unique characteristics and can play a decisive role in the success of a project. In this article, we’ll explore what MVP and MLP are, their key differences, and help you choose the right approach for your product.


What is an MVP

An MVP (Minimum Viable Product) is a streamlined version of your product, designed to include only the essential features needed to test key assumptions and gather valuable feedback from early users. By focusing on the core elements that matter most to your target audience, an MVP helps you avoid unnecessary complexity and reduce costs and risks in the early stages of product development. It allows startups to quickly test their ideas in the market with a functional product, rather than investing heavily in a fully developed version.

When and Why Should You Choose an MVP

  • When you need to gather user feedback: An MVP provides a real-world testing environment where you can interact with early adopters and collect valuable feedback. Understanding how users perceive your product—what they like, what they don’t, and where improvements are needed—is key to iterating and improving your product over time.
  • When you're in early-stage development: The primary benefit of an MVP is its ability to quickly validate a basic product concept or hypothesis. Instead of building a full-fledged product, you can test the core idea with a smaller investment, allowing you to gather essential insights early on and avoid spending resources on something that might not resonate with your audience.

Advantages of MVP:

  • Rapid market testing: You can get your product in front of users quickly, testing your core ideas and assumptions without a large investment of time and money.
  • Low upfront costs: Since you’re only building the essential features, you save on development costs, allowing you to use your resources more effectively.
  • Quick feedback for product improvement: With an MVP, you can identify which features work well and which need adjustment, enabling you to make data-driven decisions for future iterations.

Disadvantages of MVP:

  • Limited functionality: Because an MVP only includes the core features, it might not fully meet the needs of all potential users. Some may find the product lacking in features or usability.
  • Risk of low user engagement: If your MVP feels too "raw" or underdeveloped, it may fail to generate user excitement or keep them engaged, which could hurt early adoption.

If you want to understand more about what an MVP is and why it’s crucial for startups, we’ve covered this in detail in our article, What is an MVP and Why Is It Crucial for Startups.


What is an MLP

An MLP (Minimum Lovable Product) goes beyond the basic idea of an MVP by incorporating not just the essential features, but also elements that create a connection with the user. While an MVP is about testing assumptions, an MLP is designed to delight users from the start. It includes the core functionalities needed for the product to work, along with additional features or design aspects that evoke emotions and make users excited to engage with it.

Unlike the MVP approach, which is focused on minimizing cost and risk, the MLP takes a slightly different path by considering user experience in a way that makes the product stand out in a crowded market. The goal isn’t just to have a functional product but one that users feel compelled to keep using because it offers them real value and an emotional connection.

When and Why Should You Choose an MLP

  • When attracting users is critical: If your product’s success depends not just on validating a hypothesis but on creating an emotional connection with users from the outset, an MLP is likely the better approach. By adding those extra touches that users love, you can gain early adopters who will advocate for your product.
  • When your product is ready for scaling: An MLP is often a good fit for products that have reached a certain maturity level. It’s designed for businesses that are looking to create a lasting impression and build a loyal customer base. By engaging users with a polished experience, you set the stage for long-term growth and retention.

Advantages of MLP:

  • User appeal and increased loyalty: When a product resonates with its users, it can lead to strong brand loyalty. Users are more likely to stick with a product they love and recommend it to others, creating organic growth through word-of-mouth.
  • Ability to gather more meaningful feedback: Because users are emotionally invested, the feedback you gather from them can be more insightful. They’re not just telling you what works; they’re telling you what excites them or what could be improved to enhance their experience.
  • Greater potential for marketing and attracting investors: A product that users genuinely love has a higher chance of generating buzz in the market. This emotional appeal can make it easier to market and attract the attention of investors, who are always on the lookout for products with strong user engagement and growth potential.

Disadvantages of MLP:

  • Higher upfront development costs: Unlike the MVP approach, which focuses on building only the essentials, developing an MLP requires additional features and refinements. This can make the initial investment larger, as you’re looking to create a more polished, user-friendly product from the beginning.
  • The risk of building a "too big" product: There’s a fine line between a lovable product and one that’s over-complicated. Investing too many resources into features that aren’t critical or delaying the product release in search of perfection can result in a product that is too big and not yet ready for widespread release. You might miss out on valuable user feedback during the early stages of development.

Comparing MVP and MLP

Comparing MVP and MLP

How to Choose Between MVP or MLP

The decision between an MVP and an MLP really depends on where you are in the development process and what you hope to achieve at that stage. Each approach serves a different purpose, and understanding your business goals will help guide your choice.

When is MVP the right choice

If you're just starting out, the MVP approach is perfect for testing the viability of your product idea. At this point, you're looking to minimize your investment while getting early feedback on your concept. An MVP allows you to validate whether your product can address a real problem or pain point in the market. It's an ideal choice when the main goal is to learn, iterate, and refine the idea without overcommitting to development.

This method works best when you need to:

  • Validate assumptions about your product.
  • Minimize upfront costs while still getting real-world feedback.
  • Test a basic concept to determine if it's worth pursuing further.

When should you go for an MLP

On the other hand, an MLP is suited for situations where you’re more confident in your product’s core concept and want to make an impression on users from the start. Rather than just getting feedback, the goal with an MLP is to engage users emotionally by offering them something they will genuinely love and want to keep using. If your product is ready to scale and you want to attract attention and build loyalty right from the beginning, an MLP is a better fit.

An MLP is the right choice if:

  • You want to attract and retain users by offering more than just the basic features.
  • Your product is already well-defined, and you're aiming to build a loyal user base from the start.
  • You have the resources to invest in creating something users will truly connect with.

So, which one should you choose?

Ultimately, it comes down to where you are in the product lifecycle and what your immediate goals are. If you’re still figuring out your concept and need to test its viability, start with an MVP. But if you're ready to engage users on a deeper level and want to build a product that users are excited to use, an MLP will help you create that lasting connection from the very beginning.


Conclusion

Choosing between MVP and MLP depends on various factors: goals, resources, time, and strategy. Both approaches can be successful if applied correctly, depending on the product development stage. It’s crucial to remember that both MVP and MLP should be aligned with your long-term goals and growth strategy.

At Frontetica, we have extensive experience in developing MVPs, helping businesses bring their ideas to life while minimizing risk and maximizing user insights. If you're considering an MVP for your project, check out our MVP Development Services to learn more about how we can support your journey.

Let’s talk about your project

Approved symbol
Thank you! Your submission has been received!
Error symbol
Oops! Something went wrong while submitting the form.